sik2 protein (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Sik2 Protein, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sik2 protein/product/Proteintech
Average 88 stars, based on 16 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "SIK2-mediated phosphorylation of GABARAPL2 facilitates autophagosome–lysosome fusion and rescues neurodegeneration in an Alzheimer’s disease model"
Article Title: SIK2-mediated phosphorylation of GABARAPL2 facilitates autophagosome–lysosome fusion and rescues neurodegeneration in an Alzheimer’s disease model
Journal: Translational Neurodegeneration
doi: 10.1186/s40035-025-00514-4
Figure Legend Snippet: Age-dependent downregulation of SIK2 was observed in the middle-aged AD transgenic mouse models and AD patients. a Bioinformatics analysis revealed reduced SIK2 expression in the temporal cortex of AD patients compared to controls. b Sik2 mRNA levels in the hippocampus of 2-, 5-, 8-, and 10-month-old WT and 5 × FAD mice ( n = 6/group), assessed by qPCR. c Quantification of SIK2 protein levels in the hippocampus of 2-, 5-, 8-, and 10-month-old WT and 5 × FAD mice ( n = 5/group), assessed by western blot. d Representative immunoblots of SIK2 in the dorsal hippocampus of 2-, 5-, 8-, and 10-month-old WT and 5 × FAD mice. e, f Representative immunoblots and quantification of SIK2 in the hippocampus of 2-, 5-, 8-, and 10-month-old WT and 5 × FAD mice ( n = 3/group). g, h MWM performance of WT and 5 × FAD mice. Escape latency during training trials (1–7 days) ( g ). Percentage of time spent in the target quadrant during the probe trial (day 8) ( h ). i Number of platform crossings during the probe trial (day 8). j, k Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between hippocampal SIK2 protein levels and cognitive performance (percentage of time in the target quadrant ( j ) and number of platform crossings ( k )) in WT ( n = 5) and 5 × FAD mice ( n = 5). The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and the P value from the F-test of the overall fit are shown on the graphs. The solid line represents the line of best fit. l SIK2-specific RNA probes combined with NeuN immunofluorescence in the dentate gyrus (DG) of WT and 5 × FAD mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. m Quantification of SIK2 intensity in DG NeuN⁺ cells ( n = 3/group). n Double-label immunofluorescence showing SIK2 (red) and NeuN (green) colocalization in the DG region of WT and 5 × FAD mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. o Quantification of SIK2 intensity in DG NeuN⁺ cells ( n = 3/group). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired Mann–Whitney test ( i ), unpaired two-tailed t -test ( a, h, m, o ), linear regression analysis ( j, k ), one-way ANOVA ( b, c, f ), and two-way ANOVA ( g ) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Transgenic Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: SIK2 alleviates the cognitive impairment and enhances the synaptic plasticity in middle-aged 5 × FAD mice. a–e MWM performance of WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice. Escape latency during training trials (1–7 days) ( a ) and probe trial (day 8) ( b ). Platform crossings ( c ), percentage of time in the target quadrant ( d ), and swimming speed ( e ) during the probe trial (day 8). Sample sizes: n = 21 (WT-control), n = 22 (WT-SIK2), n = 19 (5 × FAD-control), n = 19 (5 × FAD-SIK2). f, g Long-term potentiation (LTP) recordings in hippocampal CA1 regions. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was applied, and fEPSP amplitudes were quantified during the last 10 min ( g ). Sample sizes: n = 3 mice, 7 slices per group. h Ultrastructural analysis of synapses in hippocampal CA1 region via TEM. sv, synaptic vesicle; sc, synaptic cleft; PSD, postsynaptic density. Scale bars: 1 µm (top images), 250 nm (bottom images). i, j Quantitative analysis of PSD thickness and SC width ( n = 2 mice, 5 images per mouse). k-m Dendritic morphology of CA1 pyramidal neurons. Representative images ( k ) and Sholl analysis of branch intersections ( l-m ). Scale bars, 500 µm (upper), 50 µm (middle), 10 µm (lower). Sample size: n = 7 dendrites from 3 mice per group. n, o MAP2 immunofluorescence staining in the CA1 region. Representative images ( n ) and quantitative analysis ( o ). Scale bar, 50 µm. p, q Western blot analysis of SIK2, SYN, PSD95, and BDNF in dorsal hippocampal lysates. Representative immunoblots ( p ) and quantitative analyses ( q ) ( n = 6 per group). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA ( b, c-g , i, j, l, m, o, q ), and three-way ANOVA ( a ) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test, and Scheirer-Ray-Hare test followed by the Dunn’s post-hot test ( c ). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, & P < 0.05
Techniques Used: Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: SIK2 reduces Aβ deposition in 5 × FAD mice. a, b Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of SIK2, Aβ (6E10), APP, and BACE1 in the dorsal hippocampus of WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice ( n = 6/group). c, d Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of SIK2, Aβ (6E10), APP, and BACE1 in the dorsal hippocampus of WT-control, WT-shSIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-shSIK2 mice ( n = 6/group). e, g Immunofluorescence staining for Aβ (6E10) in the dentate gyrus (DG) of WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice. Representative images ( e ) and quantification ( g ) ( n = 3/group). Scale bar, 50 µm. f, h Immunofluorescence staining for Aβ (6E10) in the DG of WT-control, WT-shSIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-shSIK2 mice. Representative images ( f ) and quantification ( h ) ( n = 3/group). Scale bar, 50 µm. i, j ELISA quantification of soluble and insoluble Aβ 1–42 levels in hippocampal homogenates of WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice ( n = 4/group). k, l ELISA quantification of soluble and insoluble Aβ 1–42 levels in hippocampal homogenates of WT-control, WT-shSIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-shSIK2 mice ( n = 4/group). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA ( b-d , g-l ) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test. * P < 0.05, ** P <0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: SIK2 enhances autophagic flux in AD models. a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showing significant activation of autophagy-related pathways in N2a-APP-SIK2 versus N2a-APP cells ( P = 0.0024, FDR < 0.05). b, c Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of SIK2, p62, LC3B, and APP in N2a, N2a-APP, N2a-SIK2, and N2a-APP-SIK2 cells ( n = 6). d, e Detection of lysosomal acidification in N2a, N2a-SIK2, N2a-APP, N2a-APP-SIK2, and N2a-APP-RAPA cells by mRFP-GFP-LC3 tandem fluorescence. Autophagosomes show double mRFP + GFP + signals (yellow spots), and functional autophagosomes showed mRFP + GFP - signals (red spots). Representative images ( d ) and quantization ( e ) ( n = 8–9/group). Scale bar, 10 μm. f, g Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of SIK2, p62, and LC3B in N2a-APP cells treated with chloroquine (CQ, 50 μmol/L, 12 h) or bafilomycin A1 (BafA1, 100 nmol/L, 12 h) ( n = 3 per group). h, i TEM images of autophagosomes (orange arrows) and autolysosomes (yellow arrows) in N2a, N2a-APP, N2a-SIK2, and N2a-APP-SIK2 cells. Scale bars, 1 µm. Quantitative analysis of autophagic vacuoles ( i ). j, k Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of SIK2, p62, and LC3B in WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice ( n = 6/group). l, m TEM images of autophagosomes (orange arrows) and autolysosomes (yellow arrows) in WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice. Scale bars, 500 nm. Quantitative analysis of autophagic vacuoles ( m ). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired two-way ANOVA ( c, e, g, i, k, m ) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Western Blot, Fluorescence, Functional Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: SIK2 phosphorylates GABARAPL2 at Serine 72 to enhance autophagic flux. a-f Co-IP analysis of interactions between SIK2 and LC3A ( a ), LC3B ( b ), LC3C ( c ), GABARAP ( d ), GABARAPL1 ( e ), or GABARAPL2 ( f ) in N2a cells overexpressing SIK2-flag, using anti-flag antibodies. Asterisks indicate co-precipitated ATG8 bands. Hc: IgG heavy chain. g, h Co-IP analysis of interactions between LC3A, LC3B, LC3C, GABARAP, GABARAPL1, or GABARAPL2 and SIK2 in N2a cells overexpressing respective flag-tagged ATG8 family members, using anti-flag antibodies. i, j Representative immunoblots and quantification of SIK2, p62, and LC3B in N2a-APP cells with GABARAPL2 knockdown and SIK2 overexpression ( n = 3/group). k Schematic of SIK2 domain organization highlighting the kinase domain and LIR motif. Deletion mutants are illustrated below. l, m Co-IP analysis of interactions between GABARAPL2 and SIK2 deletion mutants (SIK2(1–290)-His, SIK2(1–550)-His, SIK2(1–650)-His, SIK2(1–931)-His) using anti-His antibodies. n, o Representative immunoblots and quantification of SIK2, p62, and LC3B in N2a-APP cells with SIK2 deletion mutants ( n = 3/group). p Competitive binding. Purified full-length SIK2 protein were incubated with GST-GABARAPL2 and increasing concentrations of LIR peptide and subjected to GST pull-down. q Quantification of competitive binding in ( p ). r Volcano plot of differentially phosphorylated sites in N2a-APP-SIK2 versus N2a-APP cells. s, t Representative immunoblots and quantification of GABARAPL2, p62, and LC3B in N2a-APP cells with GABARAPL2 mutants ( n = 3/group). u Representative immunoblots of GABARAPL2 and p-GABARAPL2(Ser72) in WT-control, WT-SIK2, 5 × FAD-control, and 5 × FAD-SIK2 mice ( n = 6/group). v The quantification of p-GABARAPL2 in the dorsal hippocampus ( n = 6/group). w, x N2a-APP cells overexpressing GABARAPL2-flag were transfected with control or SIK2 for 24 h. Immunoprecipitated with anti-flag antibody and probed with anti-p-Ser72-GABARAPL2 antibody by Western blot. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired two-tailed t -test ( x ), one-way ANOVA ( m, q ) and two-way ANOVA ( j, o, t, v ) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Western Blot, Knockdown, Over Expression, Binding Assay, Purification, Incubation, Control, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Phospho-GABARAPL2 at Ser72 alleviates the cognitive impairment of middle-aged 5 × FAD mice. a-e MWM performance of WT-control, 5 × FAD-control, 5 × FAD-PL2(WT), 5 × FAD-PL2(72A), and 5 × FAD-PL2(72E) mice. Escape latency during training trials (1–6 days) ( a ) and probe trial (day 7) ( b ). Platform crossings ( c ), percentage of time in the target quadrant ( d ), and swimming speed ( e ) during the probe trial (day 7). Sample sizes: n = 12 (WT-control), n = 10 (5 × FAD-control), n = 10 (5 × FAD-PL2(WT)), n = 10 (5 × FAD-PL2(72A)), n = 10 (5 × FAD-PL2(72E)). f, g Long-term potentiation (LTP) recordings in hippocampal CA1 regions. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was applied, and fEPSP amplitudes were quantified during the last 10 min ( g ). Sample sizes: n = 3 mice, 7 slices per group. h, i Immunofluorescence staining for Aβ in the CA1 region. Representative images ( h ) and quantitative analysis ( i ). Scale bar, 50 µm. j, k Western blot analysis of GABARAPL2, p-GABARAPL2(Ser72), p62, LC3B, SYN, PSD95, and Aβ in dorsal hippocampal lysates. Representative immunoblots ( j ) and quantitative analyses ( k ) ( n = 6 per group). l, m TEM images of autophagic vacuoles. Representative images ( l ) and quantitative analysis ( m ). Orange arrows: double-membrane autophagosomes; yellow arrows: single-membrane autolysosomes with electron-dense contents. Scale bars, 500 nm. n KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs between 5 × FAD-control and 5 × FAD-PL2(72E) mice, showing the top 10 enriched pathways. o Proposed model illustrating how SIK2 regulates autophagosome–lysosome fusion and neurodegeneration in AD. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA ( b, d-g, i, k, m ), and three-way ANOVA ( a ) followed by the Tukey’s post-hoc test, and Scheirer-Ray-Hare test followed by the Dunn’s post-hot test ( c ). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001
Techniques Used: Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Western Blot, Membrane
![A–D) SKOv3 cells were transfected with either non-targeting siRNA (A) or <t>SIK2</t> siRNA (B) for 48 hr then monitored for 16 hr (one image every 5 minutes) using bright field phase-contrast microscopy. The time interval from nuclear envelope breakdown (0:00 in A and B) to anaphase onset (01:20 in control cells) was estimated. Arrows point to the cell under study. Time is shown as hours:minutes. Scale bar, 10 µm. In C Western blot confirmation of knockdown of SIK2 using 3 independent siRNAs compared to non-targeting siRNA control is shown. r-GST-SIK2; recombinant GST-tagged SIK2 was used on the same Western blot to confirm the antibody specificity. D) The mean ± s.e.m of the mitotic transition time (obtained as in A and B) is presented following control and SIK2 siRNA transfections. In E, SKOv3 cells (5000 cells per well) were reverse transfected in 96 well plates using either non-targeting controls or SIK2 siRNAs A, B and C for 24 hr and cells were then either a) fixed and stained using crystal violet to estimate the number of cells on the day of paclitaxel treatment (Day 0) or b) treated with either diluent or paclitaxel at 9 different concentrations. The latter group of cells was fixed and stained 72 hr following drug treatment. Growth of cells from day 0 to day 3 was estimated and the percentage paclitaxel-induced growth inhibition for each siRNA in relation to diluent treated cells transfected with the same siRNA was calculated and a least-squares fit was obtained to estimate the GI 50 as described in methods (Monks et al., 1991). Shown is the mean ± s.e.m from three replicates per concentration. In F the effect of depletion of SIK2 using siRNA C on paclitaxel response in three cell lines is shown. The experiment was conducted as in E. Shown is the mean ± s.e.m from six replicates per concentration. Also shown is the p value for the comparison between the GI 50 in cells transfected with non-targeting siRNA control v cells transfected with SIK2 siRNA. G) Microarray expression data for two probe sets representing SIK2 were used to generate Kaplan Meier survival curves for high expressing (defined as cancers with values above the median + (0.5 × median absolute deviation [MAD]) or low expressing (below the median − (0.5 × MAD) for 229 high-grade serous (HGS) ovarian cancers. See also Figure S2 and Movies Smov1–3.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_4541/pmc03954541/pmc03954541__nihms229878f2.jpg)